Yes, I think that's the root of confusion regarding kata and forms.
Of course there are such things as good and bad forms, useful and useless.
If we go with the broader definition of forms though, it can be said that ALL teachers use forms to teach their students. A boxing trainer showing the proper form of a jab or an uppercut would be showing his form to his students in the same manner that a Judo sensei would demonstrate the first set of throws from the nage no kata. Within the same line of thought, different FMA instructors would always be correcting my overhead strike with a stick. One would say that allowing a small part of the stick to protrude from the bottom of my fist is "bad form" as even an inch of reach is critical to hitting your opponent. Another would say that it is proper form as it gives me the options to attack with a puño if the fight went to close range. These in the broader definition, are examples of form training, therefore I agree with you as well.
Like men, all kata are not created equal.
Like you I do not have much faith in rehearsing sequences of predetermined movements as being reliant on these somewhat hinders the "expect the unexpected" mindset of the practitioner. Although I would like to reiterate what TK mentioned regarding these kata, that before the advent of camcorders, these forms did have the function of preserving an art's techniques, like how a catalog would display a company's portfolio.



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks




Reply With Quote


Bookmarks